Photogrammetry in the Structure of Transdisciplinary Archaeology: an Example of Modelling Artefacts From the Medieval Steppe of Ukraine
Keywords:
Ukraine, Steppe, Golden Horde period, nomads, photogrammetry, 3D, methodology.
Abstract
The paper focuses on applying Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry as a tool for archaeological research. It dwells on its impact on contemporary archaeological science and discusses the practical experience of 3D modeling. To illustrate the applied solutions, the article focuses on five artefacts from the Golden Horde period from the Ukrainian Steppe. The paper aims to contribute to the set methodological and didactic efforts and thus impact Ukrainian archaeology, improving its competitive potential. Therefore, a large part of the text is devoted to describing the data acquisition setup and process with particular attention to the demands of the process and specific hints to be known. Considerable attention is paid to highlighting specific practical limitations of the method, together with their causes and effects. Moreover, the text expands on what these limitations mean for practicing archaeologists and what needs to be considered when starting to work with photogrammetry. This is provided through a straightforward explanation to ensure the transdisciplinary communication between photogrammetrists and archaeologists.
The methodological issues are presented via the 3D models of the five Golden Horde period Ukrainian steppe artefacts. This selection is explained by the lack of coverage of the interaction between the steppe nomads and the Golden Horde in Ukrainian research history. Therefore, the first part of the text also contains a detailed presentation of the artefacts’ archaeological context and suggested attribution.
The second part of the paper describes photogrammetric equipment and methods, procedures, and subtleties of photogrammetric study of small objects. The choice of equipment and the essential parameters are discussed and summarized in an overview table as they directly affect the 3D modeling results. The importance of data acquisition scenario development and the coherence of research needs with methodological tools is highlighted.
The photogrammetric procedures result in an entirely new level of study and representation of archaeological artefacts in Ukraine's Medieval archaeology. The models are featured with detailed descriptions, including specific observations of their individual features. This characterization level clearly demonstrates the photogrammetric method’s research potential if enriched with archaeological context and multidisciplinary study.
References
Andreev, V. Kalkuliator GRIP. O fotografii. Available at: https://vasili-photo.com/articles/dof-calculator.html [Accessed 22 September 2024].
Belorybkin, G. N. 2001. Zolotarevskoe poselenie. Penza: PGPU.
Veremeychyk, O. M. 2018. Ceramics of the Middle of the 13th century from the jeweler’s estate in Lyubech. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 4(29), p. 297-316. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2018.04.17.
Hnera, V. A. 2017. Archaeological Aerial Photography with the Help of quadrocopters DJI Phantom (Comparative Analysis). Pytannia istorii nauky i tekhniky, 4, p. 52-60.
Hnera, V. A., Pashkovskyi, O. A. 2018. 3D-modeliuvannia v muzeiefikatsii fundamentiv Desiatynnoi tserkvy. Opus Mixtum, 6, p. 202-204.
Yelnykov, M. V. 2016. Hillfort “Konskie Vody” in Written Sources of 17th—20th century. Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 46, p. 19-23.
Evglevskij, A. V., Potemkina, T. M. 2000. On Some Types of Pottery Ceramics of Eastern European Nomads of Developed Middle Ages. In: Evglevskij, A. V. (exec. ed.). The European Steppes in the Middle Ages, 1. Donetsk: DonGU, p. 209-226.
Evarnitskii, D. I. 1907. Raskopki kurganov v predelakh Ekaterinoslavskoi gubernii. In: Trudy XIII Arkheologicheskogo siezda v Ekaterinoslave, 1. Moscow (w. ed.), p. 108-157.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2017. Fotohrammetrychna fiksatsiia u polovii arkheolohii na prykladi pamiatok Podesennia. In: Horbanenko, S. A., Hrechko, D. S., Korokhina, A. V. (eds.). Interpretatsiia arkheolohichnykh dzherel: zdobutky ta vyklyky. Matarialy naukovoi konferentsii molodykh vchenykh. Kyiv: Starodavnii svit, p. 134-137.
Zhyhola, V. S. 2018. Metrolohichni doslidzhennia 3D-modelei arkheolohichnoi keramiky. In: Diatlov, V. O. (exec. ed.). Serednovichni ta rannomoderni starozhytnosti Tsentralno-Skhidnoi Yevropy. Chernihiv: Natsionalnyi universytet «Chernihivskyi kolehium» imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, p. 47-54.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2019. The newest fixation methods in archaeology. Arheologia, 2019, 1, p. 118-130. https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2019.01.118.
Zhyhola, V. S. 2020. Digital Fixation of the 10th Century Burial. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 2(35), p. 321-326. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2020.02.23.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2021. Zastosuvannia fotohrammetrychnykh metodiv u keramolohii. Arkheolohichna keramolohiia, 1–2 (5–6), p. 181-191.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2022. Photogrammetric Topographic Basis of Archaeological Site. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 3(44), p. 456-465. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.03.31.
Ibragimova, A. M. 2013. Bakhchisaray khan’s palace 16–18 century. Simferopol: National academy of Sciences of Ukraine institute of archaeology.
Katalog Ekaterinoslavskogo oblastnogo muzeia im. A. N. Polia. 1910.. Ekaterinoslav: Tipografiia gubernskogo zemstva.
Klymyshyna, I., Korsun, A. 2003. Astronomichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. Lviv: Holovna astronomichna observatoriia NAN Ukrainy.
Kovaleva, I. F., Marina, Z. P., Romashko, V. L., Teslenko, D. L., Shalobudov, V. N., Veklenko, V. A. 2003. Kurgany eneolita-bronzy v krivorozhskom techenii Ingultsa. Dnepropetrovsk: DNU.
Kravchenko, A. A. 1986. Srednevekovyi Belgorod na Dnestre (konets XIII—XIV vv.). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
Lesnichii, P. P. 2002. Pozdnekochevnicheskie pogrebeniia u s. Zelenyi Gai na r. Ingulets.In: Kovalova, I. F. (exec. ed.). Problemy arkheolohii Podniprovia. Dnipropetrovsk: RVV DNU, p. 112-123.
Makhortykh, S. V., Kotova, N. S., Dzhos, V. S., Radchenko, S. B. 2020. New Burial and Ritual Assemblages of Early Bronze Age Located near the Complex of Kamyana Mohyla. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 4(37), p. 226-239.
Medvedev, A. F. 1966. Ruchnoe metatelnoe oruzhye (luk i strely, samostrel) VIII—XIV vv. Arheologiia SSSR. Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov, vol. EI–36. Moskva: Nauka.
1998. Nakaz «Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii z topohrafichnoho znimannia u masshtabakh 1:5000, 1:2000, 1:1000 ta 1:500 (HKNTA-2.04-02-98)» № 56 vid 09.04.98, m. Kyiv [online]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0393-98#Text [Accessed 26 Sempember 2024].
Nykonenko, D. D., Radchenko, S. B., Volkov, A. V. 2017. Vytautas Tower According to Modern Photogrammetric Studies. Arheologia, 4, p. 120-129. https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2017.04.120.
Pletneva, S. A. 1981. Kochevniki vostochnoevropeiskikh stepei v X—XIII vv. Pechenegi, torki, polovtsy. In: Pletneva, S. A. (exec. ed.). Stepi Evrazii v epokhu srednevekovia. Moskva.
Polevoi, L. L., Byrnia, P. P. 1974. Srednevekovye pamiatniki XIV—XVII. Arkheologicheskaia karta Moldavskoi SSR, vol. 7. Kishinev: Shtiintsa.
Radchenko, S. B., Nykonenko, D. D. 2020. Fotohrammetrychni doslidzhennia hospodarskykh obiektiv rannoi zaliznoi doby. In: Boltryk, Yu. V. (exec. ed.), Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2020, p. 361-363.
Radchenko, S. B., Dudok, T. H. 2023. Mirna shkala dlia masshtabuvannia ta vymiriuvannia modelei. Patent na korysnu model No. 153395. Bulletin of Legal Rights, 26, p. 4-11.
Serdiuk, M. Y. 2020. Kharakterystyka arkheolohichnoi kolektsii DNIM “Starozhytnosti piznikh kochovykiv IX—XIV st.”. Naukovyi arkhiv DNIM, without no, ark. 7.
Fedorov-Davydov, G. A. 1966. Kochevniki Vostochnoi Evropy pod vlastiu zolotoordynskikh hanov. Moskva: MGU.
Fedorov-Davydov, G. A. 2001. Zolotoordynskie goroda Povolzhia: Keramika. Torgovlia. Byt. Moskva. MGU.
Shvetsov, M. L. 1980. Kotly iz pogrebenii srednevekovykh kochevnikov. Sovetskaia arkheologiia, 2, p. 192-202.
Aicardi, I., Chiabrando, F., Lingua, A., Noardo, F. 2017. Recent Trends in Cultural Heritage 3D Survey: The Photogrammetric Computer Vision Approach. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, р. 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.11.006
Anderson, R. C. 1982. Photogrammetry: The Pros and Cons for Archaeology. World Archaeology, 14(2), p. 205-205.
Archaeology Guidelines Supplement Photogrammetry. 2022. State Historic Preservation Office. Columbus. Ohio History Connection.
Barba, S., Barbarella, M., Di Benedetto, A., Fiani, M., Gujski, L., Limongiello, M. 2019. Accuracy Assessment of 3D Photogrammetric Models from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Drones, 3(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3040079.
Benavides Lopez, J. A., Aranda Jiménez, G., Sánchez Romero, M., Alarcón García, E., Fernández Martín, S., Lozano Medina, A., Esquivel Guerrero, J. A. 2016. 3D Modelling in Archaeology: The Application of Structure from Motion Methods to the Study of the Megalithic Necropolis of Panoria (Granada, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 10, p. 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.11.022.
Benito-Calvo, A., Crittenden, A. N., Livengood, S. V., Sánchez-Romero, L., Martínez-Fernández, A., de la Torre, I., Pante, M. 2018. 3D 360° Surface Morphometric Analysis of Pounding Stone Tools used by Hadza Foragers of Tanzania: A New Methodological Approach for Studying Percussive Stone Artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 20, p. 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.06.003.
Bernasik, J. 2008. Wykłady z fotogrametrii i teledetekcji. Kraków (w. ed.).
Cambridge in Color. 2020. Depth of Field Calculator. Available at: https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/dof-calculator.htm [Accessed 22 September 2024].
Cerasoni, J. N., Nascimento Rodrigues, F., Tang, Y., Yuko Hallett, E. 2022. Do-It-Yourself Digital Archaeology: Introduction and Practical Applications of Photography and Photogrammetry for the 2D and 3D Representation of Small Objects and Artefacts, PlosOne, 17(4), e0267168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267168.
Doneus, M., Verhoeven, G., Fera, M., Briese, C., Kucera, M., Neubauer, W. 2011. From Deposit to Point Cloud — a Study of Low-cost Computer Vision Approaches for the Straightforward Documentation of Archaeological Excavations. Geoinformatics CTU FCE, 6, p. 81-88. https://doi.org/10.14311/gi.6.11.
Dubinsky, L., David, M., Grosman, L. 2023. Recognizing Technique Variation in Rock Engravings: ArchCUT3-D for Micromorphological Analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 316. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01742-7.
Farjas, M. 2009. Digital Photogrammetry: 3D Representation of Archaeological Sites. [online]. Available at:: https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/wp-content/uploads/photogrammetry1.pdf [Accessed 03 January 2024].
Fregonese, L., Fassi, F., Achille, C., Adami, A., Ackermann, S., Nobile, A., Giampaola, D., Carsana, V. 2016. 3D Survey Technologies: Investigations on Accuracy and Usability in Archaeology. The Case Study of the New “Municipio” Underground Station in Naples. Acta Imeko, 5(2), p. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v5i2.342.
Fussell, A. 1982. Terrestial Photogrammetry in Archaeology. World Archaeology, 14(2), p. 151-172.
Guidi, G., Malik, U. S., Micoli, L. L. 2020. Optimal Lateral Displacement in Automatic Close-Range Photogrammetry. Sensors, 20, 6280. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216280.
Green, S., Bevan, A., Shapland, M. 2014. A Comparative Assessment of Structure from Motion Methods for Archaeological Research. Journal of Archaeological Science, 46, p. 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.030.
Haaland, M. M., Strauss, A. M., Velliky, E. C., Mentzer, S. M., Miller, C. E., van Niekerk, K. L., Henshilwood, C. S. 2021. Hidden in Plain Sight: A Microanalytical Study of a Middle Stone Age Ochre Piece Trapped Inside a Micromorphological Block Sample. Geoarchaeology, 36, p. 283-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21830.
Hermon, S., Polig, M., Driessen, J., Jans, G., Bretschneider, J. 2018. An Integrated 3D Shape Analysis and Scientific Visualization Approach to the Study of a Late Bronze Age Unique Stone Object from Pyla-Kokkinokremos, Cyprus. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 10, e00075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00075.
Maietti, F., Piaia, E., Ferrari, F., Brunoro, S. 2016. Input to Standardization in 3D Data Acquisition. Deliverable Report D2.2. Inception, 30 November 2016 [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/ downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5ae948a36&appId=PPGMS [Accessed 22 September 2024].
Li, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, L., Jia, D. 2016. Construction and Accuracy Test of a 3D Model of Non-Metric Camera Images Using Agisoft PhotoScan. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 36, p. 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.proenv.2016.09.031
Lidén, K., Eriksson, G. 2013. Archaeology vs. Archaeological Science: Do We Have a Aase? Current Swedish Archaeology, 21, p. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2013.01.
Magnani, M., Douglass, M., Schroder, W., Reeves, J., Braun, D. R. 2020. The Digital Revolution to Come: Photogrammetry in Archaeological Practice. American Antiquity, 85(4), p. 737-760. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.59.
Mahmoud El-Nokrashy, O. A., Mohamed Ashraf, E., Ahmed Abd-Elreheem, M., Abbas, M. 2000. Accuracy Analysis for New Close-Range Photogrammetric Systems. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXIII, part B5, p. 17-24.
Marín-Buzón, C.; Pérez-Romero, A.; López-Castro, J. L.; Ben Jerbania, I.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. 2021. Photogrammetry as a New Scientific Tool in Archaeology: Worldwide Research Trends. Sustainability, 13, 5319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095319.
Markiewicz, J., Pilarska, M., Łapiński, S., Kaliszewaska, A., Bieńkowski, R., Cena, A. 2019. Quality Assessment of the Use of a Medium Format Camera in the Investigation of Wall Paintings: An Image-Based Approach. Measurement, 132, p. 224-237. https://doi.org/j.measurement.2018.07.001.
McCarthy, J. K. 2015. Multi-Image Photogrammetry as a Practical Tool for Cultural Heritage Survey and Community Engagement. Journal of Archaeological Science, 43, p. 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.01.010.
McGlone, J. C. (ed.). 2013. Manual of Photogrammetry. Sixth Edition. ASPRS.
Porter, S. T., Roussel, M., Soressi, M. 2016. A Simple Photogrammetry Rig for the Reliable Creation of 3D Artifact Models in the Field Lithic Examples from the Early Upper Paleolithic Sequence of Les Cottés (France). Advances in Archaeological Practice, 4, p. 71-86. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.4.1.71.
Radchenko, S. 2022. Rediscovered Mesolithic Rock Art Collection from Kamyana Mohyla Complex in Eastern Ukraine. Open Archaeology, 8(1), p. 114-131. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0230.
Radchenko, S. 2023. Parietal and Portable Art of Kamyana Mohyla, Ukraine. London: BAR Publishing.
Radchenko, S., Kiosak, D. 2022. Upper Paleolithic rock art of Ukraine Between Here and Nowhere. Quaternary International, 640, p. 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2022.09.008.
Rahaman, H., Champion, E. 2019. To 3D or Not 3D: Choosing a Photogrammetry Workflow for Cultural Heritage Groups. Heritage, 2(112), p. 1836-1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2030112.
Sorrentino, G., Menna, F., Remondino, F., Paggi, M., Longo, L., Borghi, A., Re, A., Lo Guidice, A. 2023. Close-Range Photogrammetry Reveals Morphometric Changes on Replicative Ground Stones. PlosONE, 18(8), e0289807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289807.
Verhoeven, G. 2011. Taking Computer Vision Aloft — Archaeological Threedimensional Reconstructions from Aerial Photographs with Photoscan. Archaeological Prospection, 18, 1, p. 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399.
Widerski, T., Daliga, K. 2018. Accuracy Analysis of 3D Model Obtained by Photogrammetric Method on the Example of Historic Room from Wisłoujście Fortress. E3S Web of Conferences, 63, e00013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186300013.
Belorybkin, G. N. 2001. Zolotarevskoe poselenie. Penza: PGPU.
Veremeychyk, O. M. 2018. Ceramics of the Middle of the 13th century from the jeweler’s estate in Lyubech. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 4(29), p. 297-316. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2018.04.17.
Hnera, V. A. 2017. Archaeological Aerial Photography with the Help of quadrocopters DJI Phantom (Comparative Analysis). Pytannia istorii nauky i tekhniky, 4, p. 52-60.
Hnera, V. A., Pashkovskyi, O. A. 2018. 3D-modeliuvannia v muzeiefikatsii fundamentiv Desiatynnoi tserkvy. Opus Mixtum, 6, p. 202-204.
Yelnykov, M. V. 2016. Hillfort “Konskie Vody” in Written Sources of 17th—20th century. Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 46, p. 19-23.
Evglevskij, A. V., Potemkina, T. M. 2000. On Some Types of Pottery Ceramics of Eastern European Nomads of Developed Middle Ages. In: Evglevskij, A. V. (exec. ed.). The European Steppes in the Middle Ages, 1. Donetsk: DonGU, p. 209-226.
Evarnitskii, D. I. 1907. Raskopki kurganov v predelakh Ekaterinoslavskoi gubernii. In: Trudy XIII Arkheologicheskogo siezda v Ekaterinoslave, 1. Moscow (w. ed.), p. 108-157.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2017. Fotohrammetrychna fiksatsiia u polovii arkheolohii na prykladi pamiatok Podesennia. In: Horbanenko, S. A., Hrechko, D. S., Korokhina, A. V. (eds.). Interpretatsiia arkheolohichnykh dzherel: zdobutky ta vyklyky. Matarialy naukovoi konferentsii molodykh vchenykh. Kyiv: Starodavnii svit, p. 134-137.
Zhyhola, V. S. 2018. Metrolohichni doslidzhennia 3D-modelei arkheolohichnoi keramiky. In: Diatlov, V. O. (exec. ed.). Serednovichni ta rannomoderni starozhytnosti Tsentralno-Skhidnoi Yevropy. Chernihiv: Natsionalnyi universytet «Chernihivskyi kolehium» imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, p. 47-54.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2019. The newest fixation methods in archaeology. Arheologia, 2019, 1, p. 118-130. https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2019.01.118.
Zhyhola, V. S. 2020. Digital Fixation of the 10th Century Burial. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 2(35), p. 321-326. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2020.02.23.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2021. Zastosuvannia fotohrammetrychnykh metodiv u keramolohii. Arkheolohichna keramolohiia, 1–2 (5–6), p. 181-191.
Zhyhola, V. S., Skorokhod, V. M. 2022. Photogrammetric Topographic Basis of Archaeological Site. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 3(44), p. 456-465. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.03.31.
Ibragimova, A. M. 2013. Bakhchisaray khan’s palace 16–18 century. Simferopol: National academy of Sciences of Ukraine institute of archaeology.
Katalog Ekaterinoslavskogo oblastnogo muzeia im. A. N. Polia. 1910.. Ekaterinoslav: Tipografiia gubernskogo zemstva.
Klymyshyna, I., Korsun, A. 2003. Astronomichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. Lviv: Holovna astronomichna observatoriia NAN Ukrainy.
Kovaleva, I. F., Marina, Z. P., Romashko, V. L., Teslenko, D. L., Shalobudov, V. N., Veklenko, V. A. 2003. Kurgany eneolita-bronzy v krivorozhskom techenii Ingultsa. Dnepropetrovsk: DNU.
Kravchenko, A. A. 1986. Srednevekovyi Belgorod na Dnestre (konets XIII—XIV vv.). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
Lesnichii, P. P. 2002. Pozdnekochevnicheskie pogrebeniia u s. Zelenyi Gai na r. Ingulets.In: Kovalova, I. F. (exec. ed.). Problemy arkheolohii Podniprovia. Dnipropetrovsk: RVV DNU, p. 112-123.
Makhortykh, S. V., Kotova, N. S., Dzhos, V. S., Radchenko, S. B. 2020. New Burial and Ritual Assemblages of Early Bronze Age Located near the Complex of Kamyana Mohyla. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 4(37), p. 226-239.
Medvedev, A. F. 1966. Ruchnoe metatelnoe oruzhye (luk i strely, samostrel) VIII—XIV vv. Arheologiia SSSR. Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov, vol. EI–36. Moskva: Nauka.
1998. Nakaz «Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii z topohrafichnoho znimannia u masshtabakh 1:5000, 1:2000, 1:1000 ta 1:500 (HKNTA-2.04-02-98)» № 56 vid 09.04.98, m. Kyiv [online]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0393-98#Text [Accessed 26 Sempember 2024].
Nykonenko, D. D., Radchenko, S. B., Volkov, A. V. 2017. Vytautas Tower According to Modern Photogrammetric Studies. Arheologia, 4, p. 120-129. https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2017.04.120.
Pletneva, S. A. 1981. Kochevniki vostochnoevropeiskikh stepei v X—XIII vv. Pechenegi, torki, polovtsy. In: Pletneva, S. A. (exec. ed.). Stepi Evrazii v epokhu srednevekovia. Moskva.
Polevoi, L. L., Byrnia, P. P. 1974. Srednevekovye pamiatniki XIV—XVII. Arkheologicheskaia karta Moldavskoi SSR, vol. 7. Kishinev: Shtiintsa.
Radchenko, S. B., Nykonenko, D. D. 2020. Fotohrammetrychni doslidzhennia hospodarskykh obiektiv rannoi zaliznoi doby. In: Boltryk, Yu. V. (exec. ed.), Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2020, p. 361-363.
Radchenko, S. B., Dudok, T. H. 2023. Mirna shkala dlia masshtabuvannia ta vymiriuvannia modelei. Patent na korysnu model No. 153395. Bulletin of Legal Rights, 26, p. 4-11.
Serdiuk, M. Y. 2020. Kharakterystyka arkheolohichnoi kolektsii DNIM “Starozhytnosti piznikh kochovykiv IX—XIV st.”. Naukovyi arkhiv DNIM, without no, ark. 7.
Fedorov-Davydov, G. A. 1966. Kochevniki Vostochnoi Evropy pod vlastiu zolotoordynskikh hanov. Moskva: MGU.
Fedorov-Davydov, G. A. 2001. Zolotoordynskie goroda Povolzhia: Keramika. Torgovlia. Byt. Moskva. MGU.
Shvetsov, M. L. 1980. Kotly iz pogrebenii srednevekovykh kochevnikov. Sovetskaia arkheologiia, 2, p. 192-202.
Aicardi, I., Chiabrando, F., Lingua, A., Noardo, F. 2017. Recent Trends in Cultural Heritage 3D Survey: The Photogrammetric Computer Vision Approach. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, р. 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.11.006
Anderson, R. C. 1982. Photogrammetry: The Pros and Cons for Archaeology. World Archaeology, 14(2), p. 205-205.
Archaeology Guidelines Supplement Photogrammetry. 2022. State Historic Preservation Office. Columbus. Ohio History Connection.
Barba, S., Barbarella, M., Di Benedetto, A., Fiani, M., Gujski, L., Limongiello, M. 2019. Accuracy Assessment of 3D Photogrammetric Models from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Drones, 3(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3040079.
Benavides Lopez, J. A., Aranda Jiménez, G., Sánchez Romero, M., Alarcón García, E., Fernández Martín, S., Lozano Medina, A., Esquivel Guerrero, J. A. 2016. 3D Modelling in Archaeology: The Application of Structure from Motion Methods to the Study of the Megalithic Necropolis of Panoria (Granada, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 10, p. 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.11.022.
Benito-Calvo, A., Crittenden, A. N., Livengood, S. V., Sánchez-Romero, L., Martínez-Fernández, A., de la Torre, I., Pante, M. 2018. 3D 360° Surface Morphometric Analysis of Pounding Stone Tools used by Hadza Foragers of Tanzania: A New Methodological Approach for Studying Percussive Stone Artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 20, p. 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.06.003.
Bernasik, J. 2008. Wykłady z fotogrametrii i teledetekcji. Kraków (w. ed.).
Cambridge in Color. 2020. Depth of Field Calculator. Available at: https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/dof-calculator.htm [Accessed 22 September 2024].
Cerasoni, J. N., Nascimento Rodrigues, F., Tang, Y., Yuko Hallett, E. 2022. Do-It-Yourself Digital Archaeology: Introduction and Practical Applications of Photography and Photogrammetry for the 2D and 3D Representation of Small Objects and Artefacts, PlosOne, 17(4), e0267168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267168.
Doneus, M., Verhoeven, G., Fera, M., Briese, C., Kucera, M., Neubauer, W. 2011. From Deposit to Point Cloud — a Study of Low-cost Computer Vision Approaches for the Straightforward Documentation of Archaeological Excavations. Geoinformatics CTU FCE, 6, p. 81-88. https://doi.org/10.14311/gi.6.11.
Dubinsky, L., David, M., Grosman, L. 2023. Recognizing Technique Variation in Rock Engravings: ArchCUT3-D for Micromorphological Analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 316. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01742-7.
Farjas, M. 2009. Digital Photogrammetry: 3D Representation of Archaeological Sites. [online]. Available at:: https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/wp-content/uploads/photogrammetry1.pdf [Accessed 03 January 2024].
Fregonese, L., Fassi, F., Achille, C., Adami, A., Ackermann, S., Nobile, A., Giampaola, D., Carsana, V. 2016. 3D Survey Technologies: Investigations on Accuracy and Usability in Archaeology. The Case Study of the New “Municipio” Underground Station in Naples. Acta Imeko, 5(2), p. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v5i2.342.
Fussell, A. 1982. Terrestial Photogrammetry in Archaeology. World Archaeology, 14(2), p. 151-172.
Guidi, G., Malik, U. S., Micoli, L. L. 2020. Optimal Lateral Displacement in Automatic Close-Range Photogrammetry. Sensors, 20, 6280. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216280.
Green, S., Bevan, A., Shapland, M. 2014. A Comparative Assessment of Structure from Motion Methods for Archaeological Research. Journal of Archaeological Science, 46, p. 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.030.
Haaland, M. M., Strauss, A. M., Velliky, E. C., Mentzer, S. M., Miller, C. E., van Niekerk, K. L., Henshilwood, C. S. 2021. Hidden in Plain Sight: A Microanalytical Study of a Middle Stone Age Ochre Piece Trapped Inside a Micromorphological Block Sample. Geoarchaeology, 36, p. 283-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21830.
Hermon, S., Polig, M., Driessen, J., Jans, G., Bretschneider, J. 2018. An Integrated 3D Shape Analysis and Scientific Visualization Approach to the Study of a Late Bronze Age Unique Stone Object from Pyla-Kokkinokremos, Cyprus. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 10, e00075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00075.
Maietti, F., Piaia, E., Ferrari, F., Brunoro, S. 2016. Input to Standardization in 3D Data Acquisition. Deliverable Report D2.2. Inception, 30 November 2016 [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/ downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5ae948a36&appId=PPGMS [Accessed 22 September 2024].
Li, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, L., Jia, D. 2016. Construction and Accuracy Test of a 3D Model of Non-Metric Camera Images Using Agisoft PhotoScan. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 36, p. 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.proenv.2016.09.031
Lidén, K., Eriksson, G. 2013. Archaeology vs. Archaeological Science: Do We Have a Aase? Current Swedish Archaeology, 21, p. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2013.01.
Magnani, M., Douglass, M., Schroder, W., Reeves, J., Braun, D. R. 2020. The Digital Revolution to Come: Photogrammetry in Archaeological Practice. American Antiquity, 85(4), p. 737-760. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.59.
Mahmoud El-Nokrashy, O. A., Mohamed Ashraf, E., Ahmed Abd-Elreheem, M., Abbas, M. 2000. Accuracy Analysis for New Close-Range Photogrammetric Systems. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXIII, part B5, p. 17-24.
Marín-Buzón, C.; Pérez-Romero, A.; López-Castro, J. L.; Ben Jerbania, I.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. 2021. Photogrammetry as a New Scientific Tool in Archaeology: Worldwide Research Trends. Sustainability, 13, 5319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095319.
Markiewicz, J., Pilarska, M., Łapiński, S., Kaliszewaska, A., Bieńkowski, R., Cena, A. 2019. Quality Assessment of the Use of a Medium Format Camera in the Investigation of Wall Paintings: An Image-Based Approach. Measurement, 132, p. 224-237. https://doi.org/j.measurement.2018.07.001.
McCarthy, J. K. 2015. Multi-Image Photogrammetry as a Practical Tool for Cultural Heritage Survey and Community Engagement. Journal of Archaeological Science, 43, p. 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.01.010.
McGlone, J. C. (ed.). 2013. Manual of Photogrammetry. Sixth Edition. ASPRS.
Porter, S. T., Roussel, M., Soressi, M. 2016. A Simple Photogrammetry Rig for the Reliable Creation of 3D Artifact Models in the Field Lithic Examples from the Early Upper Paleolithic Sequence of Les Cottés (France). Advances in Archaeological Practice, 4, p. 71-86. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.4.1.71.
Radchenko, S. 2022. Rediscovered Mesolithic Rock Art Collection from Kamyana Mohyla Complex in Eastern Ukraine. Open Archaeology, 8(1), p. 114-131. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0230.
Radchenko, S. 2023. Parietal and Portable Art of Kamyana Mohyla, Ukraine. London: BAR Publishing.
Radchenko, S., Kiosak, D. 2022. Upper Paleolithic rock art of Ukraine Between Here and Nowhere. Quaternary International, 640, p. 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2022.09.008.
Rahaman, H., Champion, E. 2019. To 3D or Not 3D: Choosing a Photogrammetry Workflow for Cultural Heritage Groups. Heritage, 2(112), p. 1836-1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2030112.
Sorrentino, G., Menna, F., Remondino, F., Paggi, M., Longo, L., Borghi, A., Re, A., Lo Guidice, A. 2023. Close-Range Photogrammetry Reveals Morphometric Changes on Replicative Ground Stones. PlosONE, 18(8), e0289807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289807.
Verhoeven, G. 2011. Taking Computer Vision Aloft — Archaeological Threedimensional Reconstructions from Aerial Photographs with Photoscan. Archaeological Prospection, 18, 1, p. 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399.
Widerski, T., Daliga, K. 2018. Accuracy Analysis of 3D Model Obtained by Photogrammetric Method on the Example of Historic Room from Wisłoujście Fortress. E3S Web of Conferences, 63, e00013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186300013.
Abstract views: 533 PDF Downloads: 287
Published
2025-03-19
Issue
Section
Methods of Archaeological Research
Copyright (c) 2025 Arheologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
